Who says what? Studying social media discourses on international protection

 

Who’s mentioned more frequently in social media posts related to refugees and migrants: Angelina Jolie, Pope Francis, or Donald Trump? Which political leaders appear more frequently? Which organizations do people talk about in relation to migrants and refugees? In this vlog, Anamaria Dutceac Segesten presents some of our preliminary data on social media discourses surrounding refugees and migrants.

 

 

 

One of the goals of PROTECT is to charter prevailing discourses on refugees and migrants circulating in the public sphere. This is done by examining content from social media and news media – the actors, and networks of actors involved in producing discourses, and the ideas and attitudes they communicate.

This research is the focus of PROTECT’s Work Package 7, which combines analyses of media outputs from over 30 000 multi-lingual news sources with millions of social media posts from Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, Reddit, blogs, and more.

The data material stretches from 2014-2019 and captures the coverage of and reactions to real-world events such as the peak of the refugee crisis, Brexit, the adoption of the Global Compacts, and more.

This graph shows the frequency distribution of news sources mentioning the concepts ‘refugee’ and ‘asylum’ between 2014 and 2019, the peaks indicate a clear surge in mentions of these concepts at the start of the refugee crisis in 2015. Photo: PROTECT

 

While the main data analyses are scheduled for 2021, the newly retrieved social media data from the AI-driven listening tool Brandwatch still reveals some of the main patterns and ideas circulating in social media discourses on refugees and migrants. In the vlog below, Anamaria Dutceac Segesten unpacks the data and presents a rudimental analysis of the data material:

 

The essence of Work Package 7:

PROTECT’s Work Package 7 is co-led between Anamaria Dutceac Segesten from Lund University and Slavko Splichal, and Boris Mance from the University of Ljubljana.

At PROTECTs Kick-off Conference in Brussels on 9 March 2020, the co-leaders presented the aims and content of Work Package 7:

 


Related blogs:

In a previous blog, Dr. Sara Schmitt from the University of Stuttgart has reflected upon the potential of conducting social media research. Analyzing social media discourses on migration and asylum issues can reveal new cleavages in society, political polarization, and ideological fragmentation – and help us understand how discourses differ across different social media platforms, claims Schmitt, who is also involved in the research of WP7.

Read more below: